Non-competition agreements and their enforceability are the subject of many blogs and legal articles floating the web. I typically stray from over-blogged topics such as this, however, each time I am confronted with an issue involving a covenant not to compete, I find that the information on the web tends to be overly general and fails to address real-world practical issues surrounding these types of agreements. In that vein, I have decided to draft a four-part blog series to address practical issues I have run into involving non-competition agreements. Each part of the series is derived my experience drafting, reviewing, and litigating non-compete agreements. I am approaching this as an issue-specific blog, meaning that I assume you know that non-competition agreements are governed by Section 15.50(a) of the Texas Business & Commerce Code which provides that “a covenant not to compete is enforceable if it is ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement at the time the agreement is made to the extent that it contains limitations as to time, geographical area, and scope of activity to be restrained that are reasonable and do not impose a greater restraint than is necessary to protect the goodwill or other business interest of the promisee.” Further, Texas Courts require two factors be met in order to enforce a non-compete agreement, which are: (1) there must be consideration, and (2) the agreement must contain reasonable limitations on time, geographical area and scope of activity to be restrained. With that foundation in mind, Part One of this series will address the “Who, Want, When, Where, and Why” of non-compete agreements.
Stay tuned for Part Two where I will address drafting considerations for a non-compete agreement that complies with Texas law.
The Strong Firm prevails in dispositive motion regarding Texas economic loss rule resulting in dismissal of claims again party.Read More
The Strong Firm successfully forecloses first priority lien against multi-million dollar commercial asset.Read More
The Strong Firm secures writ of reentry after unlawful lockout of commercial tenant.Read More
The Strong Firm prevails in writ of mandamus proceeding involving denial of temporary restraining order to stop foreclosure sale.Read More