Search Site
Menu
Common Litigation Myths Debunked! Part II

In Part I of this series, I addressed the myth that lawyers must respond aggressively in all aspects of litigation to be effective. Now I want to focus on a related myth: that settlement connotes either weakness or liability.

Myth #2: If you settle, it is probably because you were going to lose at trial. You often hear references to out-of-court settlements in high-profile cases, and people frequently assume 1) the suit was a meritorious one and 2) the defendant(s) agreed to settle only because they would inevitably lose at trial. The truth is that many lawsuits are not well-supported by facts or the law, and that cases settle for myriad reasons, only a portion of which stem from fear of losing on the merits.

For example, sometimes the litigating parties have unequal access to resources. While one party may have strong claims or defenses, they may not be able to afford to take the case to trial. Even if a company has the financial means to take a case to trial, it may decide to settle for less than a full recovery, or more than it would otherwise pay, simply to save the time and cost necessary to have a court adjudicate a case.  Still other businesses decide they would rather not spend months or years in limbo while they await the outcome of litigation, and choose to resolve it as quickly as possible.

Savvy business people involved in or considering a lawsuit should ask the same questions they would when making any other important decision: Do the benefits of prosecuting or defending a suit outweigh the risks?  Are the potential benefits worth the cost to pursue (or to continue) litigation?   What is the time and resource commitment necessary to prepare the case for trial? Companies must consider not only the financial commitment to litigation, but also the personnel commitment.   Must the company suspend some or all aspects of its business operations while the litigation is pending?  As with other business matters, commercial litigation should be approached in an efficient, effective and expeditious manner, and practical resolutions to a lawsuit should be considered as often as the likelihood of victory. If you use this approach, you may discover that sometimes a settlement just makes good business sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact a Dedicated Texas Business Lawyer To Schedule a Consultation
Call 281-367-1222 or contact us online to schedule a meeting.

Strong In Action

  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm represents borrower in $42.3 million HUD construction loan for multifamily real estate development in Walton County, Florida.

    Read More
  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm acts as legal counsel for borrower in $32.1 million HUD construction loan for multifamily real estate development in Conroe, Texas.

    Read More
  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm aids borrower in $31.7 million HUD construction loan for multifamily real estate development in Nueces County, Texas.

    Read More
  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm represents borrower in the refinancing of a $3.57 million commercial mortgage-backed security for a commercial office facility in Montgomery County, Texas.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Peer Rated 2019 Award

Recent Blog Posts

“So…What Happens to My Bitcoin When I Die?” Modern Estate Planning for Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies

Millennials have complicated everything. Socializing in person wasn’t enough, so they created Facebook. Dollars weren’t enough, so they created Bitcoin. Every new app, technology or cryptocurrency brings with it more uncertainty legal uncertainty around these digital assets. Are they currency? Are they property? Can they be gifted? Can they be
Read More
“So…What Happens to My Bitcoin When I Die?” Modern Estate Planning for Digital Assets and Cryptocurrencies

A Win for Property Owners: New Texas Law Makes it Difficult for Forced Annexation

The State of Texas is a strong advocate for protecting property owners from the forced taking of land, including eminent domain, foreclosure or annexation. This year, the Texas Legislature enacted a bill that protects landowners for decades to come from forced annexation. In 1858, Texas passed the first statute allowing incorporation
Read More
A Win for Property Owners: New Texas Law Makes it Difficult for Forced Annexation

Wait… Lawyers Do That?

Since the founding of the Strong Firm P.C. in 2004, we have prided ourselves on not only providing excellent legal services, but also playing a large role in our community. Every year I have the opportunity to speak to area students from first grade through college grad students on legal-related
Read More
Wait… Lawyers Do That?

Part II – Probate: Identify the Most Efficient Probate Proceeding – Muniment of Title

Texas law provides several options to transfer ownership of a deceased person’s (usually called a “decedent”) property. We previously discussed the difference between a dependent and an independent administration. The dependent and independent administrations are used when the deceased person’s estate exceeds some minimal thresholds for size or complexity, such
Read More
Part II – Probate: Identify the Most Efficient Probate Proceeding – Muniment of Title
  • Video Vault


    Watch videos done by our legal team to gain a better understanding of your legal needs. Our lawyers give video insight into areas such as Real Estate, Business Law, Mergers & Acquisitions and much more.

Pay Retainer Online

Use our easy-to-use and secure online payment feature.
We accept all major credit cards.

Pay Your Retainer

Contact us

Quick Contact Form