Search Site
Menu
Per Capita and Per Stirpes

Per Capita and Per Stirpes

Suppose that an intestate is survived by three children and no grandchildren. Who inherits the intestate’s net estate? How much does each person get? For most people, the answer is easy and obvious. Each child takes one-third of the intestate’s net estate.

Now suppose that an intestate is survived by two grandchildren who are children of the eldest child, who has not survived, and by the two younger children of the intestate. Who inherits the intestate’s net estate? How much does each person get? The answer is no longer easy and obvious.

One view is that because the eldest child has not survived, the two grandchildren should take nothing, and that the two younger children should each take one-half of the intestate’s net estate. Another view is that the two grandchildren should take by representation the one-third share of the intestate’s net estate that the eldest child would have taken if the eldest child had survived. Under this view, the two younger children should each take one-third of the intestate’s net estate, and the two grandchildren should each take one-sixth of the intestate’s net estate. The first view is an example of per capita. The second view is an example of per stirpes (pronounced: per-STIR-peas).

Per Capita

Per capita is a Latin phrase that means “by the heads” or equally. With per capita, property is divided in equal shares among those who are in an equal degree of consanguinity (relationship by blood) to the intestate. Originally, most descent and distribution was per capita.

Per Stirpes

Over time, many courts and legislatures have found that the result of per capita, in which orphaned children take nothing, too harsh. Those courts and legislatures have embraced per stirpes. Per stirpes is a Latin phrase that means “by roots or stocks” or by representation. With per stirpes, property is divided in equal shares among those who are in an equal degree of consanguinity to the intestate, with descendants of a deceased ancestor taking the ancestor’s share by representation, as if the ancestor had survived the intestate.

Per stirpes originally applied only to grandchildren taking a child’s share by representation. Today, many states apply per stirpes, however remote the nearest relative is to the intestate. The application of per stirpes to remote relatives is technically known as modified per stirpes.

How the Statute of Descent and Distribution is Interpreted in Your State

In some states, per capita applies in some circumstances and per stirpes applies in other circumstances. When an intestate dies, everything depends on the exact wording and interpretation of the statute of descent and distribution in your state. Your lawyer can advise you. Furthermore, when making a gift to a class of persons in a will or other estate plan, it is a good idea, for the sake of clarity, to specify whether you intend per capita or per stirpes.

Copyright 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

Contact a Dedicated Texas Business Lawyer To Schedule a Consultation
Call 281-367-1222 or contact us online to schedule a meeting.

Strong In Action

  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm prevails in dispositive motion regarding Texas economic loss rule resulting in dismissal of claims again party.

    Read More
  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm successfully forecloses first priority lien against multi-million dollar commercial asset.

    Read More
  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm secures writ of reentry after unlawful lockout of commercial tenant.

    Read More
  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm prevails in writ of mandamus proceeding involving denial of temporary restraining order to stop foreclosure sale.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Peer Rated 2022 Award
  • Clio Client-Centered Certification

Recent Blog Posts

Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers

Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers As trusted legal advisors, we understand the complexities and challenges that employers face when navigating the landscape of employment law. With the ever-evolving regulatory environment, it's crucial for employers to stay informed and proactive in addressing legal concerns. One
Read More
Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers

Asset Flow in Estate Planning

Planning for the distribution of your assets upon your passing can seem a daunting task regardless of the size of your estate.  However, planning for how those assets will be distributed, and ensuring your estate plan accounts for your desired distribution, is essential. In this article, we will discuss the
Read More
Asset Flow in Estate Planning

Kelly Sullivan Joins The Strong Firm P.C. As Senior Counsel

The Strong Firm P.C. is excited to announce the addition of Kelly Sullivan to its team of experienced attorneys. Kelly adds exceptional strength to the firm’s established practice areas based on her wealth of experience in the areas of Litigation, Labor and Employment Law, Business Law and Governmental Law, Zoning
Read More
Kelly Sullivan Joins The Strong Firm P.C. As Senior Counsel

The Future of Non-Compete Agreements: Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Agreement

In July 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order aiming to limit the use of restrictive covenants in employment relationships. Opening with the premise that “a fair, open, and competitive marketplace has long been a cornerstone of the American economy, while excessive market concentration threatens basic economic liberties, democratic accountability,
Read More
The Future of Non-Compete Agreements: Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Agreement
  • Video Vault


    Watch videos done by our legal team to gain a better understanding of your legal needs. Our lawyers give video insight into areas such as Real Estate, Business Law, Mergers & Acquisitions and much more.
Contact us

Quick Contact Form