Search Site
Menu
Tortious Interference with a Contract or with Prospective Contractual Relations

Parties to a contract are entitled to performance of the contract without interference from others. Interference with a contract can lead to claims of tortious interference with performance of the contract or tortious interference with prospective contractual relations.

Tortious interference with the performance of contracts is defined in the Section 766 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts:

One who intentionally and improperly interferes with the performance of a contract (except a contract to marry) between another and a third person by inducing or otherwise causing the third person not to perform the contract, is subject to a liability to the other for the pecuniary loss resulting to the other from the failure of the third person to perform the contract.

To prove a claim of torturous interference with the performance of a contract, the plaintiff must show that the defendant caused a third party not to perform a contract with plaintiff. It must be shown that defendant intentionally caused the lack of performance and did so improperly.

Tortious interference with prospective or anticipated contractual relations is defined in Section 766B of the Restatement (Second) of Torts as: “[I]nducing or otherwise causing a third person not to enter into or continue the prospective relation or (b) preventing the other from acquiring or continuing the relation.”

For a claim of tortious interference with prospective contractual relations, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant caused a third party not to enter into a contractual relationship with the plaintiff or prevented the plaintiff from entering into their relationship. The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s conduct was intentional and improper.

Determining whether a defendant’s conduct was improper is a critical issue in actions involving claims of tortious interference with performance of a contract or tortious interference with prospective contractual relations. In determining that improper conduct, the courts normally will keep in mind that an interest of the plaintiff in an existing contract may merit more protection than a less easily defined interest in a prospective or anticipated contract.

Seven factors listed in Section 767 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts are used to determine improper conduct of the defendant:

1. The nature of the defendant’s conduct.

2. Defendant’s motive.

3. The interests of plaintiff with which defendant’s conduct interferes.

4. The interests which defendant seeks to advance.

5. The social interests in balancing defendant’s freedom to act against the contractual interests of plaintiff.

6. The “proximity or remoteness” of defendant’s conduct relative to the interference claimed by plaintiff.

7. The relations between plaintiff and defendant.

A claim of tortious interference is more difficult to prove when the claim is made against a competitor. In order to protect competition, intentional interference with a prospective contractual relationship will not be considered improper if the relation involves competition between the defendant and the plaintiff, the defendant does not use “wrongful means,” and the defendant is not restraining trade but is seeking to compete with the plaintiff.

Copyright 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

Contact a Dedicated Texas Business Lawyer To Schedule a Consultation
Call 281-367-1222 or contact us online to schedule a meeting.

Strong In Action

  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm prevails in dispositive motion regarding Texas economic loss rule resulting in dismissal of claims again party.

    Read More
  • Spring 2019

    The Strong Firm successfully forecloses first priority lien against multi-million dollar commercial asset.

    Read More
  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm secures writ of reentry after unlawful lockout of commercial tenant.

    Read More
  • Spring 2021

    The Strong Firm prevails in writ of mandamus proceeding involving denial of temporary restraining order to stop foreclosure sale.

    Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Peer Rated 2022 Award
  • Clio Client-Centered Certification

Recent Blog Posts

Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers

Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers As trusted legal advisors, we understand the complexities and challenges that employers face when navigating the landscape of employment law. With the ever-evolving regulatory environment, it's crucial for employers to stay informed and proactive in addressing legal concerns. One
Read More
Navigating Employment Law Concerns: A Guide To The Biggest Risks for Texas Employers

Asset Flow in Estate Planning

Planning for the distribution of your assets upon your passing can seem a daunting task regardless of the size of your estate.  However, planning for how those assets will be distributed, and ensuring your estate plan accounts for your desired distribution, is essential. In this article, we will discuss the
Read More
Asset Flow in Estate Planning

Kelly Sullivan Joins The Strong Firm P.C. As Senior Counsel

The Strong Firm P.C. is excited to announce the addition of Kelly Sullivan to its team of experienced attorneys. Kelly adds exceptional strength to the firm’s established practice areas based on her wealth of experience in the areas of Litigation, Labor and Employment Law, Business Law and Governmental Law, Zoning
Read More
Kelly Sullivan Joins The Strong Firm P.C. As Senior Counsel

The Future of Non-Compete Agreements: Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Agreement

In July 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order aiming to limit the use of restrictive covenants in employment relationships. Opening with the premise that “a fair, open, and competitive marketplace has long been a cornerstone of the American economy, while excessive market concentration threatens basic economic liberties, democratic accountability,
Read More
The Future of Non-Compete Agreements: Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Agreement
  • Video Vault


    Watch videos done by our legal team to gain a better understanding of your legal needs. Our lawyers give video insight into areas such as Real Estate, Business Law, Mergers & Acquisitions and much more.
Contact us

Quick Contact Form